Natural wonders and cultural landmarks are slowly being redefined, not as public treasures but as exclusive, pay-to-play experiences. From Boracay’s pricey resort access to rising fees at Mayon Volcano, even historic spots such as Intramuros are cashing in with expensive tours. Now, Musuan Peak, a cherished escape for many, faces a similar fate. Starting January 2026, the entrance fee will jump from ₱20 to ₱50, and the overnight stay fee will double from ₱50 to ₱100. But the real question remains: Who is this really for?
Let’s be clear, Musuan Peak is not just any tourist attraction. For many, especially the students of Central Mindanao University (CMU), it has been a low-cost haven—a place to breathe, to escape the pressure of academics, and to reconnect with nature. It is a place where anyone could take a break from the grind of everyday life. But now, as the cost of simply visiting this natural sanctuary rises, is it still really for everyone? Or is Musuan Peak becoming another commodity for the privileged few?
A slower adjustment—maybe from ₱20 to ₱30 for entrance fee and from ₱50 to ₱75 for overnight stay—could have been more easily accepted. These increases are minor, psychologically easy to handle, and remain significant for revenue generation. Gradual increases accumulate over time, allowing management to improve amenities without alienating the customers who support the establishment.
Incremental price hikes can reflect an understanding of economic conditions, especially when inflation affects everyone though not equally. For students and those with limited financial resources, even a ₱20 increase can feel significant. A tiered pricing strategy would show that the management values accessibility alongside sustainability. However, the proposed 100% fee hike—particularly in an area with many budget-conscious visitors—raises concerns that the focus is shifting from accessibility to profit-maximization.
The CMU Tourism Office’s lack of transparency regarding where these additional funds will go adds to the growing skepticism. Their announcement claims the funds will be used for site management and development, but there is no breakdown or clear explanation of how the money will be spent. Without this information or any consultation with the community, it is hard to see how these increases will truly benefit the people who make Musuan Peak special.
This is not an argument against development or efficient management, but rather an appeal for thoughtful, gradual adjustments. When people feel recognized and involved in decisions, they are more likely to support necessary changes—even when it comes to price increases. A transparent process and active involvement from CMU students could have built trust and support for necessary changes.
Musuan Peak should remain a place for everyone, not just those who can afford it. If the CMU Tourism Office is serious about improving the site, they must engage the community, provide transparency, and make adjustments that will not price out those who rely on it the most. It is time to listen to their voices and ensure Musuan Peak remains a space for all.
𝘊𝘰𝘱𝘺𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳: 𝘱𝘶𝘳𝘦𝘣𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘥𝘦𝘥𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯
𝘈𝘳𝘵𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬 𝘣𝘺: 𝘙𝘰𝘴𝘦𝘫𝘢𝘯𝘦 𝘝𝘦𝘯𝘥𝘦𝘳
𝘞𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘴: 𝘚𝘢𝘪𝘴𝘢𝘢𝘳𝘢 𝘝𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘻 & 𝘚𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘑𝘰𝘺 𝘗𝘦𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘯
